References: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 15: Line 15:
# I have superior means for reducing your risk such as deferring full delivery of sources until function has been demonstrated.
# I have superior means for reducing your risk such as deferring full delivery of sources until function has been demonstrated.
<hr>
<hr>
&sup1; as a "retainer fee", i.e. a warrant on service priced at $35 USD/hr at the time of writing.
&sup1; as a "retainer fee", i.e. a warrant on service priced at $40 USD/hr at the time of writing.

Revision as of 13:30, 31 August 2008

In general I am seeking a buyer-seller contractural relationship. I am open to being an employee but the below is addressed to contract buyers.

If the wage rate is twice my minimum rate for work on a 100% telecommute basis¹ or more:

Otherwise, the following policy applies:

  • You are welcome to use the Word doc above or do any other independent checking.
  • I find the whole references thing unenlightened:
  1. It's demeaning for the worker.
  2. Doesn't really prove anything, "past performance is no guarantee of future success".
  3. I have superior means for reducing your risk such as deferring full delivery of sources until function has been demonstrated.

¹ as a "retainer fee", i.e. a warrant on service priced at $40 USD/hr at the time of writing.