Resume FAQ: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
# [[about_Testing|<font color=black>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote>  Absolutely not.  <ref>Thought June 2012 I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=navy>final experience</font>]] with this, I can tell you now unless your overall decision/vetting process can be done with a few minutes of my time before you engage my labor, please just go away. By further experience did finally reach apodictic certainty, that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations (using just innate understanding). I'd rather not work with that kind of thing, work I do is too hard and too poorly compensated to put up with such stuff. Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=navy>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref> <ref>Or the kind of person I want to be. I only had the latter day experience by being willing to join what I characterize as negative above.</ref>  From this point, if you've read this and are presenting me with a request to take a test, challenge, etc., or perform other unpaid work as a challenge to my competence, I'll assume that you are [[:en:troll (internet)|<font color=navy>trolling</font>]]. </blockquote>
# [[about_Testing|<font color=black>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote>  Absolutely not.  <ref>Thought June 2012 I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=navy>final experience</font>]] with this, I can tell you now unless your overall decision/vetting process can be done with a few minutes of my time before you engage my labor, please just go away. By further experience did finally reach apodictic certainty, that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations (using just innate understanding). I'd rather not work with that kind of thing, work I do is too hard and too poorly compensated to put up with such stuff. Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=navy>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref> <ref>Or the kind of person I want to be. I only had the latter day experience by being willing to join what I characterize as negative above.</ref>  From this point, if you've read this and are presenting me with a request to take a test, challenge, etc., or perform other unpaid work as a challenge to my competence, I'll assume that you are [[:en:troll (internet)|<font color=navy>trolling</font>]]. </blockquote>
# <font color=red>Will you work for hire without an advance?</font> <blockquote> No. Working out sharing at little or no cost cooperatively per the domain terms with firms and individuals. Also cf. Free Goods and Services (GaS).</blockquote>
# <font color=red>Will you work for hire without an advance?</font> <blockquote> No. Working out sharing at little or no cost cooperatively per the domain terms with firms and individuals. Also cf. Free Goods and Services (GaS).</blockquote>
# <font size=4 color=black>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. American Kybernetik (me),  a set of co-workers I'm joining in production as a single interest, and the often implicit end consumer ( market / [[society|<font color=navy>society</font>]] / clients / customers ) as third.</blockquote>
# <font size=4 color=red>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. American Kybernetik (me),  a set of co-workers I'm joining in production as a single interest, and the often implicit end consumer ( market / [[society|<font color=navy>society</font>]] / clients / customers ) as third.</blockquote>
# [[bane|<font  color=brightred>How many years experience do you have with platform/language/package X?</font>]] <blockquote>  ~40 overall as a professional IT worker in 2021. As of mid 2018, 30+ C and its dialects, 30 relational database, 25 Linux, ~20 web apps, 18 Java, 10 mobile,  etc. Started in IT @ 19, had pre-professional phase, finally [https://meansofproduction.biz/blurbs blurbs].</blockquote>
# [[bane|<font  color=red>How many years experience do you have with platform/language/package X?</font>]] <blockquote>  ~40 overall as a professional IT worker in 2021. As of mid 2018, 30+ C and its dialects, 30 relational database, 25 Linux, ~20 web apps, 18 Java, 10 mobile,  etc. Started in IT @ 19, had pre-professional phase, finally [https://meansofproduction.biz/blurbs blurbs].</blockquote>
# [[references|<font  color=black>How about references?</font>]] <blockquote>  Click thru or otherwise DIY. Service worker but not a servant. ISO work play, applying skills rather than submission to attempted domination.</blockquote>
# [[references|<font  color=black>How about references?</font>]] <blockquote>  Click thru or otherwise DIY. Service worker but not a servant. ISO work play, applying skills rather than submission to attempted domination.</blockquote>
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font  color=black>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. Can probably discount/bundle but obviously on-site rate higher than current real remote rate.. </ref>.</blockquote>
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font  color=red>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. Can probably discount/bundle but obviously on-site rate higher than current real remote rate.. </ref>.</blockquote>




Line 14: Line 14:
<hr>
<hr>
<br/><br/>
<br/><br/>
<span style="position: relative; top: -30px; font-size: 10px;color:black;"><blockquote><references></references></blockquote></span>
<span style="position: relative; top: -30px; font-size: 10px;color:pink;"><blockquote><references></references></blockquote></span>

Revision as of 14:18, 19 May 2018

2018-05-19 Minor tweaks to below for subsequent jobbing activity.    

  Short answers here; click thru for more depth.


  1. Will you take our test?

    Absolutely not. [1] [2] From this point, if you've read this and are presenting me with a request to take a test, challenge, etc., or perform other unpaid work as a challenge to my competence, I'll assume that you are trolling.

  2. Will you work for hire without an advance?

    No. Working out sharing at little or no cost cooperatively per the domain terms with firms and individuals. Also cf. Free Goods and Services (GaS).

  3. How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work?

    3. American Kybernetik (me), a set of co-workers I'm joining in production as a single interest, and the often implicit end consumer ( market / society / clients / customers ) as third.

  4. How many years experience do you have with platform/language/package X?

    ~40 overall as a professional IT worker in 2021. As of mid 2018, 30+ C and its dialects, 30 relational database, 25 Linux, ~20 web apps, 18 Java, 10 mobile, etc. Started in IT @ 19, had pre-professional phase, finally blurbs.

  5. How about references?

    Click thru or otherwise DIY. Service worker but not a servant. ISO work play, applying skills rather than submission to attempted domination.

  6. On-Site Rate?

    See Jobbing Card [3].





  1. Thought June 2012 I'd had the definitive and final experience with this, I can tell you now unless your overall decision/vetting process can be done with a few minutes of my time before you engage my labor, please just go away. By further experience did finally reach apodictic certainty, that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations (using just innate understanding). I'd rather not work with that kind of thing, work I do is too hard and too poorly compensated to put up with such stuff. Also check out what Noam Chomsky says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc.
  2. Or the kind of person I want to be. I only had the latter day experience by being willing to join what I characterize as negative above.
  3. There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. Can probably discount/bundle but obviously on-site rate higher than current real remote rate..