Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,007
edits
Resume FAQ: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# [[references|<font color=red>How about references?</font>]] <blockquote> Click thru or otherwise DIY. Service worker but not a servant. ISO work play, applying skills rather than submission to attempted domination.</blockquote> | # [[references|<font color=red>How about references?</font>]] <blockquote> Click thru or otherwise DIY. Service worker but not a servant. ISO work play, applying skills rather than submission to attempted domination.</blockquote> | ||
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font color=red>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. Can probably discount/bundle but obviously on-site rate higher than current real remote rate.. </ref>.</blockquote> | # [[Per Diem FAQ|<font color=red>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. Can probably discount/bundle but obviously on-site rate higher than current real remote rate.. </ref>.</blockquote> | ||
# [[Temporality|<font color=red>What's with the weird dates? </font>]] <blockquote> I reject the Western Epoch, | # [[Temporality|<font color=red>What's with the weird dates? </font>]] <blockquote> I reject the Western Epoch, which cuts off more than half of the human historical epoch, is imprecise, and is based on a vile superstition. The chosen epoch is the traditional Chinese long count from the traditional (not Qin Shi Huang) First Emperor. It's an important element of domain and culture independence. Other epoch may be used if there is a compelling new standard.</blockquote> | ||
