Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,007
edits
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
<b>2020-09-08:</b> Is POTUS a Bullshit Job, in David Graeber's sense? Maybe when it's occupied by an innocuous figure like an Eisenhower or Clinton or Obama or any normal occupant before the current one. Trump reflects the real character of a large swathe of the US population which feels it has nowhere to go but with him and if he loses as he likely will, Biden/Harris is not going to change them into something they aren't since their base shares much of that character as well and they are only opposed to it in a superficial partisan way. If he wins, then that character will become an existential issue for those that don't share it (the educated and progressive) and thus for the current nation state, as slavery was at its last such conjuncture. As Chris Hedges put it in a recent sermon where he says he will vote for the Green candidate, this year you get your choice of representative of the oligarchy. The out of power party is betting if they can punt with at least four more years of Clinton/Obama, by 2024 the demographic shift will be sufficiently complete in their favor that whatever form Trumpism takes by that time will be unable to have more than a regional effect. The unaddressed contradiction is that in any national election, about 30% of the electorate decides because 45% don't vote.</blockquote> | <b>2020-09-08:</b> Is POTUS a Bullshit Job, in David Graeber's sense? Maybe when it's occupied by an innocuous figure like an Eisenhower or Clinton or Obama or any normal occupant before the current one. Trump reflects the real character of a large swathe of the US population which feels it has nowhere to go but with him and if he loses as he likely will, Biden/Harris is not going to change them into something they aren't since their base shares much of that character as well and they are only opposed to it in a superficial partisan way. If he wins, then that character will become an existential issue for those that don't share it (the educated and progressive) and thus for the current nation state, as slavery was at its last such conjuncture. As Chris Hedges put it in a recent sermon where he says he will vote for the Green candidate, this year you get your choice of representative of the oligarchy. The out of power party is betting if they can punt with at least four more years of Clinton/Obama, by 2024 the demographic shift will be sufficiently complete in their favor that whatever form Trumpism takes by that time will be unable to have more than a regional effect. The unaddressed contradiction is that in any national election, about 30% of the electorate decides because 45% don't vote.</blockquote> | ||
<center> | <center> | ||
<font size | <span style="font-size: 12px;background-color: black;color: lime;"><b>Aurodia Ventifol and Luleo Primoc present a musical interlude</b></span><br> | ||
<video controls> <source src=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/Aurodia.mp4></video> | <video controls> <source src=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/Aurodia.mp4></video> | ||
</audio><br> | </audio><br> | ||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
</center> | </center> | ||
<br><b> | <br><b> | ||
Thoughts below and at my </html>[[:en:User:Lycurgus|<font color=gold>User Page</font>]]<html> are speculation¹. Ofc I don't expect anything to come of such thinking, it is far removed from the more likely outcomes referred to above. America (i.e. los Estados Unidos) unfortunately appears locked in a culture of mass ignorance and backwardness which only seems to flip between | Thoughts below and at my </html>[[:en:User:Lycurgus|<font color=gold>User Page</font>]]<html> are speculation¹. Ofc I don't expect anything to come of such thinking, it is far removed from the more likely outcomes referred to above. America (i.e. los Estados Unidos) unfortunately appears locked in a culture of mass ignorance and backwardness which only seems to flip between the obstinate and oblivious and the not even wrong, more violently the more heated the friction between global secular progress and local parochial recidivism becomes. A big part of this I think is that the supposed left, isn't really in fact a left at all, except in formal opposition to it's Sith moeity over a base of shared values. As constructs of they can hardly be any threat to the established order. I think the Bill and Melindas ² understand this and for this reason are largely unconcerned about actual revolutionary change such as occurred in Russia or France, assured an Obama or a Trump is as much of an actual revolution as the consuming masses will try or buy. | ||
</blockquote></b> | </blockquote></b> | ||
<div style="text-align: justify;"> | <div style="text-align: justify;"> |