Talk:Wage labor: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| (One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although a factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | :FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although a factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC) | ||
== Second Look == | |||
This is a more radical move than I saw at first and has stood this long. Should have pulled it here I guess, often the merge source becomes unavailable to non-admins. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 00:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
:So I mistook the situation. The article had just been moved to British spelling. I don't recall there being an alternative article under the British spelling but it's quite possible and maybe that's what got merged into Capitalism. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:16, 27 June 2015 (UTC) | |||
Latest revision as of 19:16, 26 June 2015
Merge at en wiki
Apparently the original article was merged into Capitalism, a bold move which may be reversed. Doing nothing here ATM. Root (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
- FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although a factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. Root (talk) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Second Look
This is a more radical move than I saw at first and has stood this long. Should have pulled it here I guess, often the merge source becomes unavailable to non-admins. Root (talk) 00:03, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
