Antireligion: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
Line 21: Line 21:


=<div align=right><span style="text-align: right; color: navy;">As a Positive Substantive</span></div>=
=<div align=right><span style="text-align: right; color: navy;">As a Positive Substantive</span></div>=
<blockquote style="background-color: white;">
<blockquote style="background-color: white;"><blockquote>
  "Antireligion" as noted before, could refer to a reconstruction, if you will, of the thing which is generally regarded as a fundamental human impulse in a manner that doesn't suffer from the defects above observed in all the current religions known to me. While the better ones don't assert belief about counterfactual states of affairs in the physical world, they still fail the not even wrong test. In this &sect; I sketch some expectations of such an Antireligion.
  "Antireligion" as noted before, could refer to a reconstruction, if you will, of the thing which is generally regarded as a fundamental human impulse in a manner that doesn't suffer from the defects above observed in all the current religions known to me. While the better ones don't assert belief about counterfactual states of affairs in the physical world, they still fail the not even wrong test. In this &sect; I sketch some expectations of such an Antireligion.
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
Line 31: Line 31:
* It follows from the first bullet above that it will have a strong aspect of [[:en:methodological solipsism]].
* It follows from the first bullet above that it will have a strong aspect of [[:en:methodological solipsism]].
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote></blockquote>


=  <span style="color: navy;">Historical Perspectives</span> =
=  <span style="color: navy;">Historical Perspectives</span> =