DNS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 19: Line 19:
I am simply expanding this principle to its limit, creating group centric namespaces and enabling the creation of suffixes also known as Top Level Domains. Generic domain space as implemented by me extends and is based on the priced singly rooted name system and is meant to augment not replace it. Think of the public system as root domain space, the common core of all domain spaces.<br><br>
I am simply expanding this principle to its limit, creating group centric namespaces and enabling the creation of suffixes also known as Top Level Domains. Generic domain space as implemented by me extends and is based on the priced singly rooted name system and is meant to augment not replace it. Think of the public system as root domain space, the common core of all domain spaces.<br><br>


Since there is tremendous resistance to the notion of you owning your namespace, it's  important to clarify that while I am selling a particular software and service solution, it is based entirely, at the level of interface with the existing inet, on existing and proven softwares with the central distinction being delimitation of the decision to privatize corporate name services by providing a superspace that is private in the other sense, restoring the public service nature implicit in the original scheme but also fulfilling the autonomy only ever implicit before now, with authority delegated first to ARPA, then ultimately to the capitalised registries. Because of essentially being, at the level of the name system,just an application/configuration of otherwise unchanged system software, others may apply the concept to the same effect in their own solutions.<br><br><br>AKPERSONs are entitled to this service as per their capitation class as detailed in the About DNS in the SB C-六  network link above. Third class human users are only potential AKPERSONs so they see  domain space from the wild and generally lack private namespace access.<br><br>
Since there is tremendous resistance to the notion of you owning your namespace, it's  important to clarify that while I am selling a particular software and service solution, it is based entirely, at the level of interface with the existing inet, on existing and proven softwares with the central distinction being delimitation of the decision to privatize corporate name services by providing a superspace that is private in the other sense, restoring the public service nature implicit in the original scheme but also fulfilling the autonomy only ever implicit before now, with authority delegated first to ARPA, then ultimately to the capitalised registries. Because of essentially being, at the level of the name system, just an application/configuration of otherwise unchanged system software, others may apply the concept to the same effect in their own solutions.<br><br><br>AKPERSONs are entitled to this service as per their capitation class as detailed in the About DNS in the SB C-六  network link above. Third class human users are only potential AKPERSONs so they see  domain space from the wild and generally lack private namespace access.<br><br>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>

Revision as of 20:19, 5 December 2023