DNS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 6: Line 6:
<div style="height:50px;background-color:yellow;color:red;font-size:14px;"><br>&nbsp; <b> Here is the big and simple Truth you must first understand about internet domain names &mdash; </b>&nbsp; </div>
<div style="height:50px;background-color:yellow;color:red;font-size:14px;"><br>&nbsp; <b> Here is the big and simple Truth you must first understand about internet domain names &mdash; </b>&nbsp; </div>
<blockquote style="font-size:20px;text-align:justify;">
<blockquote style="font-size:20px;text-align:justify;">
Registries and Registrars don't own names, they just provide services to the natural owners, those that create them, in the priced name system with a suffix for which there are authoritative registries. Once you own a name it can never be taken from you as long as you are routing it. The public system is constructed to prevent that, as a vital principle. Suffixes are no exception, nobody really owns them although one or another registry may be the responsible top level router at a given time. The suffixes were originally considered to be public, i.e. socially owned domains or unowned generic types (.com, .edu, .gov, .org, etc.).
Registries and Registrars don't own names, they just provide services to the natural owners, those that create them, in the priced name system with a suffix for which there are authoritative registries. Once you own a name it can never be taken from you as long as you are routing it, albeit with a fee to a registrar in the public system which is constructed to prevent that, as a vital principle. Suffixes are no exception, nobody really owns them although one or another registry may be the responsible top level router at a given time. The suffixes were originally considered to be public, i.e. socially owned domains or unowned generic types (.com, .edu, .gov, .org, etc.).
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
Line 17: Line 17:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote style="font-size:20px;text-align:justify;">
<blockquote style="font-size:20px;text-align:justify;">
Since there is substantial resistance to the notion of you owning your namespace, it's  important to clarify that while I am selling a particular software and service solution, it is based entirely, at the level of interface with the existing inet, on existing and proven softwares with the central distinction being delimitation of the decision to privatize corporate name services by providing a superspace that is private in the other sense, restoring the public service nature implicit in the original scheme but also fulfilling the autonomy only ever implicit before now, with authority delegated first to ARPA, then ultimately to the capitalised registries. Because of essentially being, at the level of the name system, just an application/configuration of otherwise unchanged system software, others may apply the concept to the same effect in their own solutions.</blockquote>
Since there is substantial resistance to the notion of you owning your namespace, it's  important to clarify that while I am selling a particular software and service solution, it is based entirely, at the level of interface with the existing inet, on existing and proven softwares with the central distinction being delimitation of the decision to privatize public name space by providing a superspace that is private in the other sense, restoring the public service nature implicit in the original scheme but also fulfilling the autonomy only ever implicit before now, with authority delegated first to ARPA, then ultimately to the capitalised registries. Because of essentially being, at the level of the name system, just an application/configuration of otherwise unchanged system software, others may apply the concept to the same effect in their own solutions.</blockquote>
<blockquote style="font-size:16px;text-align:justify;">AKPERSONs are entitled to this service as per their capitation class as detailed in the About DNS text in the SB C-六  network link above. Third class human users are only potential AKPERSONs so they see  domain space from the wild and generally lack private namespace access.
<blockquote style="font-size:16px;text-align:justify;">AKPERSONs are entitled to this service as per their capitation class as detailed in the About DNS text in the SB C-六  network link above. Third class human users are only potential AKPERSONs so they see  domain space from the wild and generally lack private namespace access.


Line 23: Line 23:
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
<html><a style="position:relative;top:0px;font-size:20px;color:cyan;" href="https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/SpanishCastleMagic.mp4">No It's Not in Spain, but it's a groovy name just the same.</a></html>
</center><br>
</center><br>
<html><img width=150 align=right src=https://juan.ai-integration.biz/xasppage/xasppage.pl?XASPPAGE_STYLE=0&P=DNS></html>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
</div></div>
</div></div>

Latest revision as of 20:26, 19 July 2024