Talk:Sovereign Praxis: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
(18 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
== The fact that I am able to do that upon the basis of considerable prior production notwithstanding, as that's the general condition of production at any point in culture. ==
This §'s title was a sentence in the final Q/A from the InFAQ. I am rethinking ever hiring IT labor period. If I became wealthy there would be domestic staff and the like appropriate a greater ability to concentrate on work, but it's sorta incumbent on us to develop agents rather than to attempt to extract them as living beings from seriality, let alone engage in sinful labor practices.
As stated in the social equation ([[Praxis]]), i'm open to fusion with groups, in principle. It's not actually likely tho in reality, I won't be tied down or held back and fusion implies this given the state of the workers that would have to emerge from seriality. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 00:35, 28 January 2025 (PST)
== Expectations in the case of growth ==
Should the activity hereabout result in sufficient capital formation, I do intend to deploy that in intensifying the application of my labor by hiring other workers per the mode discussed in the prior entry. Thus, the services in these domains will in that sense continue to have me as their sole producer, albeit intensified by the lens of said free (in the sense of (really) contracted rather than employed) labor.
This will remain the case so long as I am the only equity class member.
[[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 04:18, 26 October 2024 (PDT)
== Hiring other workers ==
[https://devops1.sameboat.network/dsUserClass This] is a primal sketch of my intent for structuring a worker combine. Before the conditions for that are in place I do plan to buy labor under these specific conditions:
# The workers will be self employed contractors, substantially satisfying the [https://www.irs.gov/businesses/small-businesses-self-employed/independent-contractor-self-employed-or-employee US IRS] definition distinguishing from employee.
# The work assigned will always be work I could do myself and which will have been well specified so that is basically just execution of what I can communicate to the worker as the specifics required.
# Aside from specified work product, no control is exercised in the workers performance of the job which they are presumed to be competent to execute on their own initiative and judgment.
# The work will be paid in advance on a retainer rather than hourly or annual wage basis and where possible for specific deliverables for advisory level contractors and service contracts for journeymen.
[[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 10:13, 13 April 2024 (PDT)
== Creating value for exchange implies being a Capitalist in the actually existing form (not, continued) ==
== Creating value for exchange implies being a Capitalist in the actually existing form (not, continued) ==


Even before civilization, every adult member of a culture self reproduces on the basis of the acquired toolkit of that culture. The individual worker, artisan, etc. always is on first principles free to combine in whatever way they like with others in actual production. Various past and present worker syndicates demonstrate this fact.
Even before civilization, every adult member of a culture self reproduces on the basis of the acquired toolkit of that culture. The individual worker, artisan, etc. always is on first principles free to combine in whatever way they like with others in actual production. Various past and present worker guilds, syndicates, etc. demonstrate this fact.


It's my intention to build structures/platforms that allow others to operate as sovereign producers as well. It is not the acquisition of money, or even a great deal of it that makes you a Capitalist but rather the means by which the acquisition occurs. This distinction is already made clear in the difference between earned income and capital gains. Of course within the Capitalist framework, such as the US IRS, earned income includes earnings as a Capitalist by expropriating wage labor production directly or by shareholder proxy, by contract or the 'permanent employment' gambit. I am simply carrying that to its limit, blowing off capitalist relations and earning only from what I do in fact build myself.  
It's my intention to build structures/platforms that allow others to operate as sovereign producers as well. It is not the acquisition of money, or even a great deal of it that makes you a Capitalist but rather the means by which the acquisition occurs. This distinction is already made clear in the difference between earned income and capital gains. Of course within the Capitalist framework, such as the US IRS, earned income includes earnings as a Capitalist by expropriating wage labor production directly or by shareholder proxy, by contract or the 'permanent employment' gambit. I am simply carrying that to its limit, blowing off capitalist relations and earning only from what I do in fact build myself.  


This embodies my idea of the reform of Capitalism, the step needed to be taken to the thing which develops from Industrial Capitalism as it did from Feudal Capitalism and just as organically by building on it rather than trying to recreate the world naively on some ill considered basis. Ironically, the thing that is called capital gains, at least insofar as interest on capital which isn't directly engaging wage labor or engaged in specific profiteering is concerned, is I think the least objectionable and most acceptable expression of the power of capital. When it is the pure embodiment of social labor power and separated from the  relations of production the contradictions will have been resolved. Ironically or not, I also expect that the next stage of Capitalism will heighten some elements currently perceived generally as negatives but as before they will be offset by such benefit as to be welcomed, eagerly by some, grudgingly, tacitly, or surreptitiously by others.
Ironically, the thing that is called capital gains, at least insofar as interest on capital which isn't directly engaging wage labor or engaged in specific profiteering is concerned, is I think the least objectionable and most acceptable expression of the power of capital. When it is the pure embodiment of social labor power and separated from the  relations of production the contradictions will have been resolved. Ironically or not, I also expect that the next stage of Capitalism will heighten some elements currently perceived generally as negatives but as before they will be offset by such benefit as to be welcomed, eagerly by some, grudgingly, tacitly, or surreptitiously by others.
[[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 06:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)
 
This embodies my idea of the reform of Capitalism, the step needed to be taken to the thing which develops from Industrial Capitalism as it did from Feudal Capitalism and just as organically by building on it rather than trying to recreate the world naively on some ill considered basis. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 06:52, 16 August 2023 (UTC)


== Current Thinking ==
== Current Thinking ==