BizCard: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
</td><td>
</td><td>
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
<blockquote><div align=justify>  
<blockquote><div align=justify>  
I am trying to deal with labor-employer/client relations in a manner which is fair, equitable, and yes ''gracious''. For [[ascorbicAndCoverLetters | some]], operating in a master-slave rather than a peer-peer model of production, an aperception of arrogance or defensiveness may occur. Other than not being arrogant or defensive there is little I can do about this.
I am trying to deal with labor-employer/client relations in a manner which is fair, equitable, and yes ''gracious''. For [[ascorbicAndCoverLetters | some]], operating in a master-slave rather than a peer-peer model of production, an aperception of arrogance or defensiveness may occur. Other than not being arrogant or defensive there is little I can do about this.
Line 27: Line 26:
   respect to  the  focus many buyers have on specific packages, I generally find the time familiarizing myself with a
   respect to  the  focus many buyers have on specific packages, I generally find the time familiarizing myself with a
   new package is a fraction of the time spent analysing the project requirements, existing codebases, etc.
   new package is a fraction of the time spent analysing the project requirements, existing codebases, etc.


<a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/calendar/render?cid=juanchief%40gmail.com"><img src="http://www.google.com/calendar/images/ext/gc_button1_en.gif" border=0></a> <font color=navy style="background-color: antiquewhite"><b><- Jobbing calendar use: <b>root@ai-integration.biz/stak3Holder or your account if not logged in to gmail. </b></font>
<a target="_blank" href="http://www.google.com/calendar/render?cid=juanchief%40gmail.com"><img src="http://www.google.com/calendar/images/ext/gc_button1_en.gif" border=0></a> <font color=navy style="background-color: antiquewhite"><b><- Jobbing calendar use: <b>root@ai-integration.biz/stak3Holder or your account if not logged in to gmail. </b></font>
Line 46: Line 44:
<html><pre><tt>
<html><pre><tt>
Hi,
Hi,
  <font color=midnightblue style="background-color: yellow"><b>
  <font color=midnightblue style="background-color: yellow"><b>
   If you are a 3rd party that can't verify your  clients interest  first using the resume link to your left before your
   If you are a 3rd party that can't verify your  clients interest  first using the resume link to your left before your

Revision as of 08:18, 3 September 2007


(01) 716 285 0414

I am trying to deal with labor-employer/client relations in a manner which is fair, equitable, and yes gracious. For some, operating in a master-slave rather than a peer-peer model of production, an aperception of arrogance or defensiveness may occur. Other than not being arrogant or defensive there is little I can do about this.

I generally send text specific to solicitations in response to the first message specifically addressed to me.
Below is general text for the 3 broad classes of solicitors.

  • General Client
    
    Hi,
     
      I'm a Sr. SW Engineer in upstate NY. Rate range is from € 30/hr for  retained support to  € 60/hr for  all inclusive
      and  on-site rate  in  North America,  € 100/hr elsewhere.  A  minimum  of  two 8 hour days for on-site in the North
      Central US and Canada, 5 days elsewhere. I always require some payment before delivering service to new  clients and
      generally  can give  net  30 terms thereafter. 
    
      I can normally give fixed cost bids for already well defined tasks. If you are not an experienced technical manager,
      you may want to keep these facts in mind when considering the cost of IT labor: 1) what it costs for other skilled/
      professional labor (e.g. auto mechanics), 2) the well known high risk and failure rate of IT projects; with 30 years
      experience I can often guarantee my work and generally take a fraction of the time of a less experienced worker and
      3) by low balling your work you may end up paying considerably more or not completing the project at all. Also with
      respect to  the  focus many buyers have on specific packages, I generally find the time familiarizing myself with a
      new package is a fraction of the time spent analysing the project requirements, existing codebases, etc.
    
     <- Jobbing calendar use: root@ai-integration.biz/stak3Holder or your account if not logged in to gmail. 
    
  • Canadian Employer ( Or a U.S. one with benefits somehow equivalent.)
    
    Hi,
     
      I'm a  Sr. SW Engineer in the Niagara region applyng for the subject job. I am open to being a T4 or W2 employee and
      have done so recently (as W2) though most of my career has been as a contractor, either independent or  thru various
      3rd parties. Regardless of the circumstances of hire, I retain  an  entrepreneurial outlook, and essentially look at 
      these gigs as 1 to 3 year contracts. My longest association with a single compay was with IBM (as a contractor thru
      various job shops) over a three distinct periods with a combined length of about 7 or 8 years in the 80s and 90s.
    
  • Recruiter or other Job Broker
    
    Hi,
     
      If you are a 3rd party that can't verify your  clients interest  first using the resume link to your left before your
      first communication addressed specifically to me then you are wasting your time here.
    
      I generally do not deal with third parties. Recruiters who are hired by an Employer on a retainer basis and of course
      in house recruiters are an exception (because they're not third parties).  Contract shops that aren't essentially Job
      Brokers are also not third parties (in effect thier clients become the third party). You are welcome to send my resume
      under your name if you can access it here and I have no problem with your collecting a fee and will notify you if I do
      close with a buyer/employer as a result of your efforts.