PHPCMS: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
</script> | </script> | ||
<table width=100% cellspacing=0><tr><td bgcolor=white width=50 ></td><td bgcolor=white ><font color=black> | <table width=100% cellspacing=0><tr><td bgcolor=white width=50 ></td><td bgcolor=white ><font color=black> | ||
<h1>About the <a href=http://typo3. | <h1>About the <a href=http://typo3.org><font color=blue>Typo3</font></a> and <a href=http://concrete5.com><font color=blue>C5</font></a> CMSes <font size=2> and what you need to support your web in general .... | ||
</html>[[Resume|<font size=2 color=navy><b>to my Resume Portal</b></font>]]<html> | </html>[[Resume|<font size=2 color=navy><b>to my Resume Portal</b></font>]]<html> | ||
</h1> | </h1> | ||
Line 45: | Line 45: | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class<br> | ¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class<br> | ||
² In my judgement, the order would be C5 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to customize or integrate with other open source software I am currently recommending either <a href=http://typo3. | ² In my judgement, the order would be C5 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to customize or integrate with other open source software I am currently recommending either <a href=http://typo3.com>Typo3</a> or C5. | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> | ³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> |
Revision as of 21:03, 17 September 2008
About the Typo3 and C5 CMSes and what you need to support your web in general .... to my Resume Portal
Tour the sample site. (← login there as 'admin' with sent pw. Note: IE 6 and older Safari not supported³)
Hosting, Performance, Development, and Maintenance
The Look and Feel of Your Site
E Commerce and other Extensions
How long and How much?
Are there any sites using this?Are you doing any development with this? | |
Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page. |