Talk:Revolution: Difference between revisions

(6 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)

Line 1:

[[:en:Talk:Revolution]]

Cloned copy here with talk threads involving me to work the § referred to above.[[User:Root|Root]] 17:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC). Make an account to comment here.

== the next step towards american revolution ==

Line 9:

Line 15:

::: Moved unsigned thread element above into proper chronological order, dunno when or who started the thread. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.150.44|72.228.150.44]] ([[User talk:72.228.150.44|talk]]) 14:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)

~~{{od}}~~ Events since my original response to this thread seem to confirm it. The violence in the [[Arab Spring]] betrays the relative backwardness of the societies in question and is still relatively non-violent in comparison with violent revolutions of the past. Revolution in American culture is a proper topic of development of a section of the article, doubt there's anything else in wiki except for the content associated with the founders war and the slaver rebellion. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

:::: Events since my original response to this thread seem to confirm it. The violence in the [[Arab Spring]] betrays the relative backwardness of the societies in question and is still relatively non-violent in comparison with violent revolutions of the past. Revolution in American culture is a proper topic of development of a section of the article, doubt there's anything else in wiki except for the content associated with the founders war and the slaver rebellion. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

== Oxymoron ==

Line 39:

Line 45:

compared to the current wikipedia norm for an article like this. I will address this if there are no objections. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 11:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

:~~Looking at~~ the section, ~~it's just crap~~, ~~somebody else will have to deal with it~~. At this point the article is relatively "clean" up to that point. This is not the right venue for anything much to be done with the body of the article other than perhaps an outline of references to other articles. The thread above on the English Civil War pretty much makes clear why. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 14:04, ~~22 September~~ 2011 (UTC)

:Addressing the body section, the one in question, is problematic. At this point the article is relatively "clean" up to that point. This is not the right venue for anything much to be done with the body of the article other than perhaps an outline of references to other articles, developing my ideas in my draft space. The thread above on the English Civil War and the timidity with which the etymology thing was dealt with pretty much makes clear why. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)

Talk:Revolution: Difference between revisions

Navigation menu

Page actions

Page actions

Personal tools

About

Search

forewords

novel

Tools

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+{{TOCleft}}
+[[:en:Talk:Revolution]]
+Cloned copy here with talk threads involving me to work the &sect; referred to above.[[User:Root|Root]] 17:34, 19 October 2011 (UTC). Make an account to comment here.
 == the next step towards american revolution ==
@@ Line 9: / Line 15: @@
 ::: Moved unsigned thread element above into proper chronological order, dunno when or who started the thread. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.150.44|72.228.150.44]] ([[User talk:72.228.150.44|talk]]) 14:00, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
-{{od}} Events since my original response to this thread seem to confirm it. The violence in the [[Arab Spring]] betrays the relative backwardness of the societies in question and is still relatively non-violent in comparison with violent revolutions of the past. Revolution in American culture is a proper topic of development of a section of the article, doubt there's anything else in wiki except for the content associated with the founders war and the slaver rebellion. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
+:::: Events since my original response to this thread seem to confirm it. The violence in the [[Arab Spring]] betrays the relative backwardness of the societies in question and is still relatively non-violent in comparison with violent revolutions of the past. Revolution in American culture is a proper topic of development of a section of the article, doubt there's anything else in wiki except for the content associated with the founders war and the slaver rebellion. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:34, 18 September 2011 (UTC)
 == Oxymoron ==
@@ Line 39: / Line 45: @@
 compared to the current wikipedia norm for an article like this. I will address this if there are no objections. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 11:27, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
-:Looking at the section, it's just crap, somebody else will have to deal with it. At this point the article is relatively "clean" up to that point. This is not the right venue for anything much to be done with the body of the article other than perhaps an outline of references to other articles. The thread above on the English Civil War pretty much makes clear why. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 14:04, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
+:Addressing the body section, the one in question,  is problematic. At this point the article is relatively "clean" up to that point. This is not the right venue for anything much to be done with the body of the article other than perhaps an outline of references to other articles, developing my ideas in my draft space. The thread above on the English Civil War and the timidity with which the etymology thing was dealt with pretty much makes clear why. [[Special:Contributions/72.228.177.92|72.228.177.92]] ([[User talk:72.228.177.92|talk]]) 15:22, 19 October 2011 (UTC)