Talk:About Testing: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(15 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 3: Line 3:
== The End ==
== The End ==


A recent experience absolutely assured I will never take anybody's test under any circumstances. In a vindication of my long screed in these pages after successfully taking one test and thinking we were beyond that stage, I was subjected to a vicious adversarial tech-out and presented with a second test to implement a core functionality in the line of biz of he startup in question. I will post the first test on the original mod_perl CMS page with the older ones shortly and the second has been posted to github (*Cache Manager") where I will refine it and make it available as free software. There was a poignancy in this because I had a pretty good rapport with CEO of the start-up and obviously I must have done well on the first test or they wouldn't have flown me cross country for what turned out be the nasty tech-out (the CEO was out of the country).  
A recent experience absolutely assured I will never take anybody's test under any circumstances. In a vindication of my long screed in these pages after successfully taking one test and thinking we were beyond that stage, I was subjected to a vicious adversarial "can you read my mind" type tech-out and presented with a second test to implement a core functionality in the line of biz of the startup in question!!! I've posted the first test on the original [http://meansofproduction.biz/eg/index.php/About_Testing mod_perl CMS page] with the older ones and as the second has been posted to github (*Cache Manager") where I make it available as free software (currently a stub of a serious app). There was a poignancy in this because I had a pretty good rapport with CEO of the start-up and obviously I must have done well on the first test or they wouldn't have flown me cross country for what turned out be a ludicrous tech-out (the CEO was out of the country) replete with various misdirections and other comic elements (e.g. stressing "SORT" when "MAP" was meant, assuming that talking about the simplest function and writing f(0) would imply a table look up, etc. The cherry was to be asked about [[:en:Dynamic Programming]], and find the questioner used it as a trick question having apparently either only superficial knowledge of it or purposely meaning to conflate it with static vs. dynamic typing.  


This absolutely confirmed that people taking this kind of mentality and myself are like cats and dogs, and the utter futility of trying to accommodate them. That the work one does is far too hard, requires far too much effort, and provides far to little compensation for the value delivered was the original reason for the policy. It's manifest in this recent experience that it's utterly futile, pointless as well, any objectivity in a coding is going to be overridden by the subjective judgment of the testers.
<html><img src="/images/puppyandkittens.jpg" align=right></html>


I have in the past used the expression "local cultures of mediocrity and failure" and that is not exactly what fits this because a certain kind of painfully narrow excellence is evinced. But in short, if you have this mindset please pass on my candidacy and don't try to talk me into taking you test and entering a process like this because I'm not going to.
This absolutely confirmed that people taking this kind of mentality and myself are like cats and dogs, and the utter futility of trying to accommodate them. That the work one does is far too hard, requires far too much effort, and provides far to little compensation for the value delivered was the original reason for the policy. This was the first time in more than 10 years I seriously took a test it made manifest  that it's utterly futile, pointless to do so at this point in my career. Any objectivity in a coding is going to be overridden by a subjective judgment by this fearful and highly negative mindset which lacks the ability to make judgements and/or is really only looking to justify its prejudices.
 
I have in the past used the expression "local cultures of mediocrity and failure" and that is not exactly what fits this because a certain kind of painfully narrow excellence is evinced. But in short, if you have this mindset please pass on my candidacy and don't try to talk me into taking your test and entering a process like this because I'm just not going to.
 
:Belatedly signing this. Will reenable registration/edits when the upgrade is unblocked. Above was last month, have moved on, but it was fascinating, a learning experience. I officially begged off on the virtual FS thing from the second test on GitHub, and enough was done on it in the area of design to contrast with the just make it work quickly approach I took in the first, but could come back to it if it turned out setting up RAM FS or a SSD or whatever wasn't much easier or useful in intended uses.. [[User:Root|Root]] 02:35, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


== Update ==
== Update ==