Talk:Quadriga: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
# Smalltalk, the main exceptions to above, is probably the last I'll be able to do something with in DS. The paid experience with it was long ago. | # Smalltalk, the main exceptions to above, is probably the last I'll be able to do something with in DS. The paid experience with it was long ago. | ||
# Haskell, Lisp, and Prolog will be integral in the MCP-DCP implementation. | # Haskell, Lisp, and Prolog will be integral in the MCP-DCP implementation. | ||
# The method of ∬ is WFL, a generalization of the Burroughs MCP (currently Unisys) product. | |||
[[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 05:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC) | [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 05:41, 4 April 2014 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:44, 3 April 2014
untitled
If you are a programmer/software engineer, whatever, people invariably want to know "what language you program in". I went to a four year university program and have 30 years of professional experience (2011) so I feel I can define myself as just a programmer, not a X programmer (see Bane). Nonetheless there is a factual, if not simple answer to the query. See the long (JDCM) resume ("Resume>>Resumes>>JDCM") for historical particulars, it's mostly been dialects of C which is what is mostly used, but the obverse indicates my preferences. Root 19:16, 23 September 2011 (UTC)
Update
A little more to say on this:
- By C dialects, AKA Algol-like langs mean basically all the comon ones today. Virtually all of my paid experience is with them as of 2014.
- Smalltalk, the main exceptions to above, is probably the last I'll be able to do something with in DS. The paid experience with it was long ago.
- Haskell, Lisp, and Prolog will be integral in the MCP-DCP implementation.
- The method of ∬ is WFL, a generalization of the Burroughs MCP (currently Unisys) product.