Antireligion: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
=<div align=right><span style="text-align: right; color: navy;">As a Positive Substantive</span></div>= | =<div align=right><span style="text-align: right; color: navy;">As a Positive Substantive</span></div>= | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
"Antireligion" as noted before, could refer to a reconstruction, if you will, of the thing which is generally regarded as a fundamental human impulse that doesn't suffer from the defects above observed in all the current religions known to me. While the better ones don't assert belief about counterfactual states of affairs, they still fail the not even wrong test. In this § I sketch some expectations of such an Antireligion. | "Antireligion" as noted before, could refer to a reconstruction, if you will, of the thing which is generally regarded as a fundamental human impulse in a manner that doesn't suffer from the defects above observed in all the current religions known to me. While the better ones don't assert belief about counterfactual states of affairs, they still fail the not even wrong test. In this § I sketch some expectations of such an Antireligion. | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
*To be consistent with rather than opposed to science and true knowledge, our Antireligion must not assert belief about the world including relations between beings but rather find them out. | *To be consistent with rather than opposed to science and true knowledge, our Antireligion must not assert belief about the world including relations between beings but rather find them out. | ||
