Resume FAQ: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 6: Line 6:
# <font size=4 color=black>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. Me,  the collective of workers I'm joining in production, represented by a single interest, and the often implicit end consumer (market/ [[society|<font color=navy>society</font>]] / clients / customers) as third.</blockquote>
# <font size=4 color=black>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. Me,  the collective of workers I'm joining in production, represented by a single interest, and the often implicit end consumer (market/ [[society|<font color=navy>society</font>]] / clients / customers) as third.</blockquote>
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font  color=black>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> There's an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, usually can discount/bundle. In practice in ad-hoc market ops, as of mid 2012, I do strictly remote and primarily fixed cost jobbing.</blockquote>
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font  color=black>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> There's an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, usually can discount/bundle. In practice in ad-hoc market ops, as of mid 2012, I do strictly remote and primarily fixed cost jobbing.</blockquote>
# [[about_Testing|<font color=black>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote>  Absolutely not. June 2012 I thought I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=navy>final experience</font>]] with this I can tell you just go away. <ref>Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=navy>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref>. I am past epistemic certainty, though, after the actual final definitive experiences that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations in a way that is incompatible with ''my'' standards for situations I want to work in.  From this point, while I will consider a written test which is 1 hour or lest, if you've read this text I'll consider a request to take a testing or other kinds of challenges to be trolling. </blockquote>
# [[about_Testing|<font color=black>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote>  Absolutely not. June 2012 I thought I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=navy>final experience</font>]] with this I can tell you unless your testing process in an hour or less please just go away. <ref>Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=navy>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref>. I am past epistemic certainty, though, after the actual final definitive experiences that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations in a way that is incompatible with ''my'' standards for situations I want to work in.  From this point, while I will consider a written test which is 1 hour or lest, if you've read this text I'll consider a request to take a testing or other kinds of challenges to be trolling. </blockquote>
# <font color=black>Will you work without an advance?</font> <blockquote> Unless the job's smaller than my min piece rate, possibly, but can't combine that with net terms in new relationship and will generally need payment at time of delivery of any substantial intellectual property. I take it as a distinction between aspirational and real capital that money can freely change hands to engage my labor, and it's standard practice that it be half in a fixed cost job/deal, but I don't generally require that. </blockquote>
# <font color=black>Will you work without an advance?</font> <blockquote> Unless the job's smaller than my min piece rate, possibly, but can't combine that with net terms in new relationship and will generally need payment at time of delivery of any substantial intellectual property. I take it as a distinction between aspirational and real capital that money can freely change hands to engage my labor, and it's standard practice that it be half in a fixed cost job/deal, but I don't generally require that. </blockquote>
<br/>
<br/>