Talk:Wage labor: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
Apparently the original article was merged into Capitalism, a bold move which may be reversed. Doing nothing here ATM. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
Apparently the original article was merged into Capitalism, a bold move which may be reversed. Doing nothing here ATM. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)


:FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although its factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)
:FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although a factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. [[User:Root|Root]] ([[User talk:Root|talk]]) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

Revision as of 19:43, 28 April 2015

Merge at en wiki

Apparently the original article was merged into Capitalism, a bold move which may be reversed. Doing nothing here ATM. Root (talk) 03:38, 29 April 2015 (UTC)

FWIW, contrary to what you might think, my text in the lede of the merge source did not have the character of orthodox Marxism apparent in the current text in the Capitalism article, although a factual presentation of the situation is often construed that way and the text you see at this moment by others does have that character. I don't disapprove but do disavow since it's an oversimplification. Root (talk) 03:42, 29 April 2015 (UTC)