Talk:EnWikiHome: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 85: Line 85:
Nothing stops us from developing to the point where we can, if you will, discover [[:en:mental Radio|radio]] and stop listening for jungle drums or looking for smoke signals. A substantial advance in physics will be required to understand this of course (as opposed to just use it, here the analogy is to the masses in world culture that use semi-conductor based technology but are oblivious to the principles of quantum mechanics upon which it is based), but at least we have a physics, primitive peoples only have their religion. [[User:Lycurgus|Lycurgus]] ([[User talk:Lycurgus#top|talk]]) 03:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)
Nothing stops us from developing to the point where we can, if you will, discover [[:en:mental Radio|radio]] and stop listening for jungle drums or looking for smoke signals. A substantial advance in physics will be required to understand this of course (as opposed to just use it, here the analogy is to the masses in world culture that use semi-conductor based technology but are oblivious to the principles of quantum mechanics upon which it is based), but at least we have a physics, primitive peoples only have their religion. [[User:Lycurgus|Lycurgus]] ([[User talk:Lycurgus#top|talk]]) 03:53, 31 December 2015 (UTC)


<div style="background-color: black; color: white;">
<div style="position: relative; left:10px; width: 98%;">


== [[Antireligion]] ==
== [[Antireligion]] ==
Line 91: Line 93:


Should you decide to work the article, an interesting use of the term not currently noted in the article would be as a substantiation of what Krishnamurti noted and currently itemized as #3 in the Schools &sect; of his article. This and the itemized logical program I gave in response to your complaint on the Antireligion talk page both refer to the possibility of a school or schools of thought which would be rightly called an "Antireligion". This connotation of the term is not currently in the Antireligion article and as a result  of a number of factors probably never will be, but it is likely a more productive thing than your efforts in re "Antireligionists" which may be a non-starter in English as there are other terms already established. [[Special:Contributions/98.4.124.117|98.4.124.117]] ([[User talk:98.4.124.117|talk]]) 21:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
Should you decide to work the article, an interesting use of the term not currently noted in the article would be as a substantiation of what Krishnamurti noted and currently itemized as #3 in the Schools &sect; of his article. This and the itemized logical program I gave in response to your complaint on the Antireligion talk page both refer to the possibility of a school or schools of thought which would be rightly called an "Antireligion". This connotation of the term is not currently in the Antireligion article and as a result  of a number of factors probably never will be, but it is likely a more productive thing than your efforts in re "Antireligionists" which may be a non-starter in English as there are other terms already established. [[Special:Contributions/98.4.124.117|98.4.124.117]] ([[User talk:98.4.124.117|talk]]) 21:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>