Synchronicity: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 7: | Line 7: | ||
He is explictly operating against two kinds of material, the mantic traditional element such as those associated with Western Astrology, the I Ching, etc. where the form of synchronicity is expected to be explained (ultimately) by some operations of meaning and the archetypes. | He is explictly operating against two kinds of material, the mantic traditional element such as those associated with Western Astrology, the I Ching, etc. where the form of synchronicity is expected to be explained (ultimately) by some operations of meaning and the archetypes. | ||
The other are the cases of telepathy which are not explainable as frauds, the experiments of Rhine, and the [[:en:Emanuel_Swedenborg|Swedenborg]] case, which are communication acts but for which causality is considered unacceptable. | The other are the cases of telepathy which are not explainable as frauds, the experiments of Rhine, and the [[:en:Emanuel_Swedenborg|<span style="background-color: white;">Swedenborg</span>]] case, which are communication acts but for which causality is considered unacceptable. | ||
