Talk:UnitXP: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
== What it is == | == What it is == | ||
<div style="background-color: white;color: navy;"><blockquote> | <div style="background-color: white;color: navy;"><blockquote> | ||
Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual. I can expound on this live, nothing more to say here. [[User:Root|Root]] | Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual. I can expound on this live, nothing more to say here. Humphrey's Personal Process was individual oriented, but it predates and is anti-thetical to Agile. Humphrey was in his 80s when Agile/Extreme came out. [[User:Root|Root]] 03:46, 12 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
</div> | </div> | ||
Revision as of 19:46, 11 May 2012
What it is
Unit XP was coined, c. '98, as just my variant for Extreme Programming. I'm quite often acting as an entire IT function, whereas Agile/Extreme, etc. generally were talking about teams of at least two developers, with non-IT personnel involved to be sure, but not in general with the development team being an individual. I can expound on this live, nothing more to say here. Humphrey's Personal Process was individual oriented, but it predates and is anti-thetical to Agile. Humphrey was in his 80s when Agile/Extreme came out. Root 03:46, 12 May 2012 (UTC)
