Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,007
edits
Resume FAQ: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
<span style="font-size: 12px;color: white;position: relative;top: -5px;"> Reduced risk, superior value. Per week/month fine, hourly not. Man week values per market/value.</span></center> | <span style="font-size: 12px;color: white;position: relative;top: -5px;"> Reduced risk, superior value. Per week/month fine, hourly not. Man week values per market/value.</span></center> | ||
# [[about_Testing|<font color=red>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote> Absolutely not. <ref>Thought June 2012 I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=cyan>final experience</font>]] with this, I can tell you now unless your overall decision/vetting process can be done with a few minutes of my time before you engage my labor, please just go away. By further experience did finally reach apodictic certainty, that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations (using just innate understanding). I'd rather not work with that kind of thing, work I do is too hard and too poorly compensated to put up with such stuff. Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=cyan>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref> <ref>Or the kind of person I want to be. I only had the latter day experience by being willing to join what I characterize as negative above.</ref> From this point, if you've read this and related pages and are presenting me with some challenge to my competence, or other hoops, I'll assume that you are [[:en:troll (internet)|<font color=cyan>trolling</font>]]. </blockquote> | # [[about_Testing|<font color=red>Will you take our test?</font>]] <blockquote> Absolutely not. <ref>Thought June 2012 I'd had the definitive and [[Talk:About Testing|<font color=cyan>final experience</font>]] with this, I can tell you now unless your overall decision/vetting process can be done with a few minutes of my time before you engage my labor, please just go away. By further experience did finally reach apodictic certainty, that no matter how tempting the work you have might be for whatever reason, there's no getting around how this casts you and/or your organization as negative and incapable of making basic judgments in IT and in human relations (using just innate understanding). I'd rather not work with that kind of thing, work I do is too hard and too poorly compensated to put up with such stuff. Also check out what [http://blip.tv/learning-without-frontiers/noam-chomsky-the-purpose-of-education-5925460 <font color=cyan>Noam Chomsky</font>] says about testing about mark 16:00, Bill Gates recent (2013-04) editorial in the NYT on testing, etc. </ref> <ref>Or the kind of person I want to be. I only had the latter day experience by being willing to join what I characterize as negative above.</ref> From this point, if you've read this and related pages and are presenting me with some challenge to my competence, or other hoops, I'll assume that you are [[:en:troll (internet)|<font color=cyan>trolling</font>]]. </blockquote> | ||
# <font color=red>Will you work for hire without an advance?</font> <blockquote> Maybe. Evaluated case by case. Also cf. Free Goods and Services (GaS) and [https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz < | # <font color=red>Will you work for hire without an advance?</font> <blockquote> Maybe. Evaluated case by case. Also cf. Free Goods and Services (GaS) and [https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz <span style="color: yellow;" class="plainlinks">wagelabor.tcb</span>].</blockquote> | ||
# <font size=4 color=red>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. <html><a style="color: cyan;" target=top href=https://juan.ai-integration.biz/everything/index.pl?node=AK>American Kybernetik</a></html> (me), a (possilbly collective/corporate) single interest (you), and market / [[society|society]] / stakeholders (everybody else as silent third partner). "My 'direct' client" indicates that you may be an extraneous fourth party without independent hiring authority. If thats' not the case then your client certainly satisfies the term "stakeholder".</blockquote> | # <font size=4 color=red>How many interests/parties you can work with in paid work? </font> <blockquote>3. <html><a style="color: cyan;" target=top href=https://juan.ai-integration.biz/everything/index.pl?node=AK>American Kybernetik</a></html> (me), a (possilbly collective/corporate) single interest (you), and market / [[society|society]] / stakeholders (everybody else as silent third partner). "My 'direct' client" indicates that you may be an extraneous fourth party without independent hiring authority. If thats' not the case then your client certainly satisfies the term "stakeholder".</blockquote> | ||
# [[Per Diem FAQ|<font color=red>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. I'm really not interested in on-site work and have done little of it this century. Global video interaction is the modern way. </ref>.</blockquote> | # [[Per Diem FAQ|<font color=red>On-Site Rate? </font>]] <blockquote> See <html><a href=https://wagelabor.thoughtcrime.biz>Jobbing Card</a> </html> <ref>There was an appearance rate in the Rate Chart, it's pushed down now. I'm really not interested in on-site work and have done little of it this century. Global video interaction is the modern way. </ref>.</blockquote> | ||
