Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,125
edits
PHPCMS: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
color=navy>PHP</font></a> CMS but superior to both. </blockquote> | color=navy>PHP</font></a> CMS but superior to both. </blockquote> | ||
<h2><a href=http://everyjuan.meansofproduction.biz/c5><font size=4 color=green>Go/Return to the sample site.</font></a> <font style="background-color: yellow" size=2> (← Take a live | <h2><a href=http://everyjuan.meansofproduction.biz/c5><font size=4 color=green>Go/Return to the sample site.</font></a> <font style="background-color: yellow" size=2> (← Take a live | ||
tour: login <b>there</b> as 'admin' with sent pw. <i>Note: IE 6 and older Safari not supported</i>)</font></h2> | tour: login <b>there</b> as 'admin' with sent pw. <i>Note: IE 6 and older Safari not supported³</i>)</font></h2> | ||
<blockquote>A strong point of C5 is the entire site is <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG><font color=navy>WYSIWYG</font></a> editable. If possible please reverse any | <blockquote>A strong point of C5 is the entire site is <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG><font color=navy>WYSIWYG</font></a> editable. If possible please reverse any | ||
edits you make. If you need a guided tour call me</blockquote> | edits you make. If you need a guided tour call me</blockquote> | ||
| Line 40: | Line 40: | ||
¹ In my judgement, the order would be C5 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to customize or integrate with other open source software I am currently recommending C5.<br><br> | ¹ In my judgement, the order would be C5 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to customize or integrate with other open source software I am currently recommending C5.<br><br> | ||
² I've used both in paid work. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class.</blockquote> | ² I've used both in paid work. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class.</blockquote> | ||
<br> | |||
&sip3; Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br> | |||
<b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b></td></tr> | <b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b></td></tr> | ||
</table> | </table> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
