MCP-CMS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
20 bytes removed ,  2 March 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 102: Line 102:
   </ol>
   </ol>
   WFL is developed in a bottom up prototyping style rather than top down from a spec, although the original is something of one, so there will be no documentation for some time  
   WFL is developed in a bottom up prototyping style rather than top down from a spec, although the original is something of one, so there will be no documentation for some time  
   other than the working job text. #3 above is implemented by different delimiters for code blocks, with BEGIN&lt;suffix&gt; and END&lt;suffix&gt; with &lt;suffix&gt; blank for A68, and LISP, HASKELL, and PROLOG respectively for the text in those langs. Lisp is common lisp, Haskell is some version of GHC, and Prolog is either logtalk or plain prolog. Lang specifics are determined by governing COMPILE and BIND statements.<br><br>
   other than the working job text. #3 above is implemented by different delimiters for code blocks, with BEGIN&lt;suffix&gt; and END&lt;suffix&gt; with &lt;suffix&gt; empty for A68, and CL, HS, LP, or PL
  for the text in the other default langs. CL is common lisp, HS is some version of GHC, LP is logtalk and PL is plain prolog. Lang specifics are determined by governing COMPILE and BIND statements.<br><br>
   Unlike standard unix shell scripts, WFL jobs are compiled first then interpreted.
   Unlike standard unix shell scripts, WFL jobs are compiled first then interpreted.
   </blockquote>
   </blockquote>

Navigation menu