MCP-CMS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
10 bytes removed ,  4 March 2023
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 110: Line 110:
   WFL is developed in a bottom up prototyping style rather than top down from a spec, although the original is something of one, so there will be no documentation for some time  
   WFL is developed in a bottom up prototyping style rather than top down from a spec, although the original is something of one, so there will be no documentation for some time  
   other than the working job text. #3 above is implemented by variants for BEGIN<suffix> and END<suffix> with <suffix> empty for A68, and CL, HS, LP, or PL  
   other than the working job text. #3 above is implemented by variants for BEGIN<suffix> and END<suffix> with <suffix> empty for A68, and CL, HS, LP, or PL  
   for the text in the other default langs. CL is common lisp, HS is some version of GHC, LP is logtalk and PL is plain prolog. Lang specifics are determined by governing COMPILE and BIND statements.<br><br>
   for the text in the KEE langs. CL is common lisp, HS is some version of GHC, LP is logtalk and PL is plain prolog. Lang specifics are determined by governing COMPILE and BIND statements.<br><br>
   Unlike standard unix shell scripts, WFL jobs are compiled first then interpreted.
   Unlike standard unix shell scripts, WFL jobs are compiled first then interpreted.
   </blockquote><br><br>
   </blockquote><br><br>

Navigation menu