Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,115
edits
PHPCMS: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 41: | Line 41: | ||
<blockquote></html>[[C-Liu|<b><font color="maroon">C-Liu</font></b>]]<html></blockquote></font> | <blockquote></html>[[C-Liu|<b><font color="maroon">C-Liu</font></b>]]<html></blockquote></font> | ||
</td></tr> | </td></tr> | ||
<tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=white> | <tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=white><font color=black> | ||
<font color=black> | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class<br> | ¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class<br> | ||
² IMHO, order would be C5 or Typo3 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to C5 is my current choice. The Typo3 site has <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html>this</a> cogent graphic of the CMS space and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/>here</a> is a link to a site for CMS evaluation.<br> | ² IMHO, order would be C5 or Typo3 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to C5 is my current choice. The Typo3 site has <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html>this</a> cogent graphic of the CMS space and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/>here</a> is a link to a site for CMS evaluation.<br> | ||
³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> | ³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> | ||
<b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b></td></tr> | <b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b> | ||
</blockquote> | |||
</td></tr> | |||
</table> | </table> | ||
</html> | </html> | ||
