Bureaucrats, Interface administrators, Administrators (Semantic MediaWiki), Curators (Semantic MediaWiki), Editors (Semantic MediaWiki), Administrators, Widget editors
23,115
edits
PHPCMS: Difference between revisions
From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
no edit summary
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 43: | Line 43: | ||
<tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=antiquewhite><font color=black> | <tr><td colspan=2 bgcolor=antiquewhite><font color=black> | ||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class. The Typo3 site has <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html> | ¹ I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class.<br> The Typo3 site has a <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html><font color=navy>cogent graphic of the whole CMS space</font></a> and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/>here</a> is a link to a site for CMS evaluation<br> | ||
² IMHO, order would be C5 or Typo3 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to C5 is my current choice. .<br> | ² IMHO, order would be C5 or Typo3 > Drupal > Joomla/Mambo. Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content. Joomla is good if you want just simple mostly static content management. Drupals strength and its weakness is its exterme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. If you want a high quality base PHP CMS to C5 is my current choice. .<br> | ||
³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> | ³ Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote> | ||
