PHPCMS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
4 bytes removed ,  20 September 2008
no edit summary
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 11: Line 11:
</h1>
</h1>
     <blockquote>A Content Management System (CMS) such as Joomla or Drupal&sup1; provides a backend for your web. <a href=http://concrete5.com><font color=blue>C5</font></a>, <a href=http://typo3.org><font color=blue>Typo3</font></a> are also <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP><font     
     <blockquote>A Content Management System (CMS) such as Joomla or Drupal&sup1; provides a backend for your web. <a href=http://concrete5.com><font color=blue>C5</font></a>, <a href=http://typo3.org><font color=blue>Typo3</font></a> are also <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/PHP><font     
     color=navy>PHP</font></a> CMSes but there are many others&sup2;. </blockquote>
     color=navy>PHP</font></a> CMSes but there are <a href=http://phpxref.com/cms/>others</a>&sup2;. </blockquote>
     <h2><a href=http://everyjuan.meansofproduction.biz/c5><font size=4 color=green>Tour the C5 sample site.</font></a> <font style="background-color: yellow" size=2> (&larr; login <b>there</b> as 'admin' with sent pw. <i>Note: IE 6 and older Safari not supported&sup3;</i>)</font></h2>
     <h2><a href=http://everyjuan.meansofproduction.biz/c5><font size=4 color=green>Tour the C5 sample site.</font></a> <font style="background-color: yellow" size=2> (&larr; login <b>there</b> as 'admin' with sent pw. <i>Note: IE 6 and older Safari not supported&sup3;</i>)</font></h2>
         <blockquote>A strong point of C5 is the entire site is <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG><font color=navy>WYSIWYG</font></a> editable. If possible please reverse any  
         <blockquote>A strong point of C5 is the entire site is <a href=http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/WYSIWYG><font color=navy>WYSIWYG</font></a> editable. If possible please reverse any  
Line 44: Line 44:
<blockquote>
<blockquote>
&sup1; &nbsp; &nbsp; I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class.  The Typo3 site has a <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html><font color=blue>cogent graphic of the whole CMS space</font></a> and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/><font color=blue>here</font></a> is a link to a site for a CMS evaluation which I can perform for your biz case for 1 hour at the current nominal web dev rate.<br>
&sup1; &nbsp; &nbsp; I've used both in paid work<sup><a href=http://www.houghtonintl.com>A</a>, <a href=http://bu.edu>B</a></sup>. There are numerous others pretty much any package organizing web pages can be called a CMS, WordPress, Typo3, and Mambo are just a few others just in the PHP class.  The Typo3 site has a <a href=http://typo3.com/Highlights.1629.0.html><font color=blue>cogent graphic of the whole CMS space</font></a> and <a href=http://www.steptwo.com.au/papers/kmc_evaluate/><font color=blue>here</font></a> is a link to a site for a CMS evaluation which I can perform for your biz case for 1 hour at the current nominal web dev rate.<br>
&sup2; &nbsp; &nbsp; Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content and TextPattern may be better for this. Joomla(1.5) is tight overall (in a good way), the base as well and the modules. Drupals strength and its weakness are its extreme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. C5 is WYSIWYG via jquery and its core design is the cleanest whence its selection as my base PHP CMS C5 of choice <a href=http://phpxref.com/cms/>at this time</a>.<br>
&sup2; &nbsp; &nbsp; Each, however, has its strengths and weaknesses. </html>[[WordPress|<font color=blue>WordPress</font>]]<html> is more of a blogging package than a CMS but a blog is content and TextPattern may be better for this. Joomla(1.5) is tight overall (in a good way), the base as well and the modules. Drupals strength and its weakness are its extreme modularity and the large number of contributed modules. C5 is WYSIWYG via jquery and its core design is the cleanest whence its selection as my base PHP CMS C5 of choice at this time.<br>
&sup3; &nbsp; &nbsp; Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote>
&sup3; &nbsp; &nbsp; Concrete5 has informed me they will not support IE6. I may do so however, I don't here in my domains but this is different. Safari 3 or better should be on any Mac, I was just late in upgrading.<br></blockquote>
<b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b>
<b><font color=red>Note: this service offering currently has little or nothing to with the use of this domain or items in the navigation to your left, except of for my resume portal and the PayPal page.</font></b>

Navigation menu