MCP-CMS: Difference between revisions

From Cibernética Americana
Jump to navigationJump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(97 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 45: Line 45:
             <a  title="mcpcms cli or webssh login if not SAR authenticated"  
             <a  title="mcpcms cli or webssh login if not SAR authenticated"  
             style="height:50px;background-color:purple;color:white;position: relative; left: 130px; top: -20px;" href=/eg/index.php/MCPCELL><b> &nbsp; launch &nbsp;</b></a>
             style="height:50px;background-color:purple;color:white;position: relative; left: 130px; top: -20px;" href=/eg/index.php/MCPCELL><b> &nbsp; launch &nbsp;</b></a>
             <span style="position: relative;left:130px;top: -20px;">&mdash; an MCP cell &sup1;  provisioned by DCP per your current context. &sup2;</span>
             <span style="position: relative;left:130px;top: -20px;">&mdash; an MCP cell &sup1;  provisioned by the Domain Control Program per your current context. &sup2;</span>
           </span>
           </span>
</div>
</div>
Line 62: Line 62:
         <tt>
         <tt>
         <ul>
         <ul>
         <li>0.3.0 4721-04-17&nbsp; 1<sup>st</sup> written tl;dr story.&dagger; </li>
         <li>0.4.0 &nbsp;074-11-02&nbsp; 1<sup>st</sup> ed. tl;dr story freeze.&dagger; </li>
         <li>0.9.0 47yy-00-00&nbsp; MCP BaselineOfDomainSpace. </li>
         <li>0.9.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; LAN and cloud provisioning for network nodes.</li>
         <li>1.0.0 47yy-00-00&nbsp; LAN and cloud vendor provisioning; production geonode flows.</li>
         <li>1.0.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; BaselineOfDCP (provisions FRED instances). </li>
         <li>1.1.0 47yy-00-00&nbsp; DCP BaselineOfKEE. </li>
         <li>1.1.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; Transparent Ledger (Books), DCP live in wild.</li>
         <li>1.2.0 &nbsp;07y-00-00&nbsp; DCP in the wild, Transparent Ledger in Books, Shopify Integration.</li>
         <li>1.2.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; BaselineOfWFL. </li>
         <li>2.0.0 &nbsp;07y-00-00&nbsp; &int; VM (CMS, MVS) / DCP &part; DS. The MF-One story.</li>
         <li>1.3.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; &int; x &Dopf; &part; DS, stable boot KEE SPA.</li>
         <li>3.0.0 &nbsp;07y-00-00&nbsp; Done 2<sup>nd</sup> tl;dr story, 1<sup>st</sup> working WFL, DGUI for job edit and debug with visual execution. </li>
         <li>2.0.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; 2<sup>nd</sup> ed. tl;dr story (feat: visual programming/execution), 1<sup>st</sup> WFL w integral DGUI IDE. </li>
         <li>4.0.0 &nbsp;07y-00-00&nbsp; Mature DDD/KEE product.</li>
        <li>2.1.0 &nbsp;07y-mm-dd&nbsp; &int; VM (CMS, MVS) / DCP &part; DS, the MF-One story.</li>
         <li>3.0.0 &nbsp;08y-mm-dd&nbsp; Mature DDD/KEE product.</li>
         </ul></tt></blockquote>
         </ul></tt></blockquote>
<center>
<center>
Line 79: Line 80:
         </span>
         </span>
         </blockquote>
         </blockquote>
<blockquote style="position:relative;left:-5px;top:-10px;z-index:200;font-size:8px;">&dagger; This page and <a href="https://devops1.sameboat.network/About DCP">About DCP</a> are top level specifying stories,  cog arch internals aren't divulged as I mean them to be adaptable without notice, everything else is source accessible by devops users.</blockquote>
<blockquote style="position:relative;left:-5px;top:-10px;z-index:200;font-size:8px;">&dagger; This page and <a href="https://devops1.sameboat.network/About DCP">About DCP</a> are top level specifying stories,  cog arch internals aren't divulged as I mean them to be adaptable without notice, everything else is source accessible by DevOps users.</blockquote>
<button type="button" class="collapsible"><div id="tldrDet">tl;dr</div></button>  
<button title="show/hide the story details" type="button" class="collapsible"><div id="tldrDet">tl;dr</div></button>  
<div class="content">
<div class="content">
<blockquote  style="width: 70%;font-weight: bold;" >
<blockquote  style="width: 70%;font-weight: bold;" >
Line 90: Line 91:
   
   
  </blockquote>
  </blockquote>
  The attempt, if it reaches the MCP, results in completion codes reported in DS control block displays in your DCMS profile.<br>
  The attempt, if it reaches the DCP, results in completion codes reported in DS control block displays in your DCMS profile.<br>
  Only ssh access from the wild, but this page will attempt, using your SAR credentials if the <a href=https://devops1.sameboat.network/roles>session role</a> is greater than 1.<br>
  Only ssh access from the wild, but this page will attempt, using your SAR credentials if the <a href=https://devops1.sameboat.network/roles>session role</a> is greater than 1.<br>
  MCP operator messages will go to your ODT message queue.
  MCP operator messages will go to your ODT message queue.
Line 97: Line 98:
<span style="font-size: 10px;position:relative;left:150px;">&sup3; MCS: a message control subsystem of a MCP.</span>
<span style="font-size: 10px;position:relative;left:150px;">&sup3; MCS: a message control subsystem of a MCP.</span>
<center class=plainlinks>
<center class=plainlinks>
  <a style="background-color:aliceblue;" href=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/MCP15SystemCommands.pdf> MCP 15 System Commands </a><br>
   <a style="background-color:aliceblue;" href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lycurgus/MoCA#Burroughs_CANDE> MCP 3.3 CANDE Reference Card</a><br>
   <a style="background-color:aliceblue;" href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Lycurgus/MoCA#Burroughs_CANDE> MCP 3.3 CANDE Reference Card</a><br>
   <a style="background-color:aliceblue;" href=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/MCP15SystemCommands.pdf> MCP 15 System Commands </a>
   <a style="background-color:aliceblue;" href=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/CANDE-MCP-14.pdf> MCP 14 CANDE Reference</a>
</center>
</center>
<img title="B6700 with memory which was wire wrapped creating for me a sense of sail rigging when the skins were off." src=https://meansofproduction.biz/images/1975-Burroughs-6700-Computer.jpg width=200 align=right style="position:relative;top:-160px;right:75px;">
<img title="B6700 with memory which was wire wrapped creating for me a sense of sail rigging when the skins were off." src=https://meansofproduction.biz/images/1975-Burroughs-6700-Computer.jpg width=200 align=right style="position:relative;top:-160px;right:75px;">
  <blockquote>
  <blockquote>
  <b>CANDE MCS</b>   
  <b>ODT MCS</b>   
   <blockquote>
   <blockquote>
     MCP-CMS connects via an MCS which is often referred to as the CANDE MCS although it is more general than that being the default ubiquitous DCP/MCP MCS.
     MCP-CMS connects via a MCS which is often referred to as the CANDE MCS although it is more general than that being the default ubiquitous DCP/MCP MCS.
     Upon <b>mcpcms</b> connect, like the lang specific subshells in the next &sect;, an additional command <b>cande</b> can be used which will process the MCP-CMS system commands
     Upon <b>mcpcms</b> connect, like the lang specific subshells in the next &sect;, an additional command <b>cande</b> can be used which will process the MCP-CMS system commands
     analogous to those in the MCP 15 document above. The system command processor is also available as a pane in the SPO.
     analogous to those in the MCP 15 document above. The system command processor is also available as a pane in the SPO.
   <br><br>
   <br><br>
   In Burroughs MCP, the CANDE MCS was used ubiquitously. I recall using a full screen editor which i think fed CANDE. The text edit functions are obsolete and
   In Burroughs MCP, the CANDE MCS was used ubiquitously. I recall using a full screen editor which i think fed CANDE. Commands are implemented per need and some such as the text edit functions likely never will be in <b>mcpcms cande</b>. CANDE is used in current Unisys MCP but neither it nor the MCS have their former prominence when the OS runs under Windows.
  not part of the <b>mcpcms cande</b>. CANDE is used in current Unisys MCP but neither it nor the MCS have their former prominence when the OS runs under Windows.
   </blockquote>
   </blockquote>
   <b>mcpcms</b>
   <b>mcpcms</b>
   <blockquote>
   <blockquote>
     A modified <b>zsh</b> for MCP serves as analog of the CMS from VM/CMS. Upon successful connect, the launch link above results in a terminal session with this shell in the browser.
     A modified <b>zsh</b> for MCP has the role CMS has in VM/CMS. Upon successful connect, the launch link above results in a terminal session with this shell in the browser.
     Aside from the modification for the MCP machine model, it is otherwise just zsh however the following (mode) commands are available to establish different shell behaviour in support of the KEE:
     Aside from the modification for the MCP machine model, it is otherwise just zsh however the following (mode) commands are available to establish different shell behaviour in support of the KEE:
     <ul><li><b>shcl</b> (common lisp nature)</li><li><b>shhs</b> (HsShellScript, haskell nature)</li><li><b>upsh</b> (prolog nature)</li></ul> Lisp and prolog implementations are variable, and multiple can be combined but shcl and upsh themselves use sbcl and swipl, respectively.
     <ul><li><b>shcl</b> </li><li><b>shhs</b></li><li><b>upsh</b></li></ul>
    which have the lisp, haskell, and prolog natures, respectively. <b>shcl</b> is the only one which is a full shell, the others are ways to do posix shell things in lang. While in general Lisp and prolog implementations can vary, shcl and upsh require sbcl and swipl, respectively. During early dev, before DCP WFL is available DCP is implemented in these shells plus MCP.
   <b>mcpcms</b> can be accessed with ssh using the following script. Using the FQDSAgentName syntax is equivalent to what the launch link does in an AKPERSONs session.<pre><tt>#!/usr/bin/bash
   <b>mcpcms</b> can be accessed with ssh using the following script. Using the FQDSAgentName syntax is equivalent to what the launch link does in an AKPERSONs session.<pre><tt>#!/usr/bin/bash
# save as &lt;fileName&gt; and invoke with &lt;fileName&gt;  &lt;connect-spec&gt; where             
# save as &lt;fileName&gt; and invoke with &lt;fileName&gt;  &lt;connect-spec&gt; where             
Line 138: Line 140:
ssh $PARMS
ssh $PARMS
</tt></pre>
</tt></pre>
  <b>mcpcms</b> is implemented first for Linux natively running or containerized in docker on Mac and Windows then for the Hercules version  where
  <b>mcpcms</b> is implemented first for MCP nodes and cells which are whole or containerized linux instances. Cloud compute resources are dynamically provisioned using either system
    VM/CMS replaces the modified zsh for that special path.  
inventory or user supplied provisioning credentials with the MCP supported cloud vendors. Later MCP for Mac and Windows will allow cells there and a version supporting Hercules will use
    Cloud compute resources are dynamically provisioned using either system inventory or user supplied provisioning credentials with supported cloud vendors.
    VM/CMS instead of mcpcms.
   </blockquote>
   </blockquote>
  <b>WFL</b>
<b>DCP WFL</b>
  <blockquote>
<blockquote>
   has eponymous origin in the <a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/mcpWFL.pdf>MCP 12 WFL</a> job control model and supports the DCP with a line of demarcation between the minimalist MCP and its extension specific to DCP which is meant to protect properties of its internals. A way to think about it and my design intent is that MCP is a basic unix cluster machine to host any common mix, while the WFL machine is a private specialization. <br><br>
   is eponymous from the <a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://meansofproduction.biz/pub/mcpWFL.pdf>MCP WFL</a> with some preserved aesthetics but as a vehicle for DCP and arch for MCP &mdash;
  Unisys WFL is just a point of departure to our WFL. In Burroughs systems, WFL didn have as high a profile as IBM JCL, the main punch of the overall system, in an industry installation, would be its system of  transactions and these ran from a database which the Burroughs architecture delivered seamlessly without WFL to terminals as a special db stack. Our WFL is the central driver and basis of our MCP architecture
<ul>
<li>The Job is not the top level construct. The Job or App is the closest construct to heritage WFL in my WFL but with ops on my MCP rather than the Burroughs/Unisys one and expansion beyond batch ops.<li>
<li>In my WFL, Namespace, Database, and then App/Job is the scope hierarchy. Namespace and Database are elements of a domain space and may span multiple MCP instances but Jobs are limited to a single MCP.</li>
</ul>
  In Burroughs systems, WFL didn have as high a profile as IBM JCL, the main punch of the overall system, in an industry installation, would be its system of  transactions and these ran from a database which the Burroughs architecture delivered seamlessly without WFL to terminals as a special db stack. Our WFL is the central driver and basis of our MCP/DCP architecture
   <ol>
   <ol>
     <li>is built for the MCP machine model</li>
     <li>implements the DCP machine model as a complement to</li>
     <li>which is a prime driver for the development of that model</li>
     <li>the MCP which provides the real machine model and</li>
     <li>with code blocks containing text of other supported langs</li>
     <li>with code blocks containing text of other supported langs</li>
   </ol>
   </ol>
   As far as the elaboration of JCL statements and so forth WFL is developed in a bottom up prototyping style without any spec other than the mainframe reference and the DCP/MCP concept, so there will be no documentation for some time
   DCP WFL is developed in a bottom up manner from this statement of design intent without any spec other than the heritage systems and the DCP/MCP concept. In the initial releases
  other than the text of actual jobs. &#8470; 3 above is implemented by variants for the SUBROUTINE statement, with the same attachment of BEGIN and END bounded blocks:
  there will be no documentation outside of story text, and the top level pamphlets. Code cannot move into WFL blocks from its free form before the 1.2.0 milestone. In standard Algol convention  &#8470; 3 above is implemented by these block variants with the same delimitation by
  BEGIN and END bounded blocks:
     <center>
     <center>
       <div style="font-size:10px;position:relative;left:0px;"><b>MCP Block Types</b></div>
       <div style="font-size:10px;position:relative;left:0px;"><b>MCP Block Types</b></div>
     <table border=2 style="color:black;background-color:lemonchiffon;width:600px;">
     <table border=2 style="color:black;background-color:lemonchiffon;width:600px;">
     <tr style="background-color:black;color:white;font-size:10px;"><td width=125 align=center >Block Declarator</td><td align=center width=90>Language</td><td align=center width=180>Intrinsic</td><td align=center width=205>Purpose/Role</td></tr>
     <tr style="background-color:black;color:white;font-size:10px;"><td width=125 align=center >Declarator</td><td align=center width=90>Language</td><td align=center width=180>Intrinsic</td><td align=center width=205>Purpose/Role</td></tr>
     <tr style="background-color:white;font-size:10px;"><td colspan=4 align=center>Front </td></tr>
     <tr style="background-color:white;font-size:10px;"><td colspan=4 align=center>Enterprise Facing </td></tr>
    <tr><td align=left>APP&sup1;,DB,NS</td><td align=center>WFL </td><td align=center>Yes</td><td><font size=1>Job, Database, &amp; Namespace control</font> </td></tr>
     <tr><td>CL</td><td align=center>Common Lisp</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Lateral R</td></tr>
     <tr><td>CL</td><td align=center>Common Lisp</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Lateral R</td></tr>
     <tr><td>HS</td><td align=center>Haskell </td><td align=center>No</td><td>Applications</td></tr>
     <tr><td>HS</td><td align=center>Haskell </td><td align=center>No</td><td>Applications</td></tr>
    <tr><td align=left>JOB</td><td align=center>WFL </td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>JCL </td></tr>
     <tr><td>LP</td><td align=center>LogTalk</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Lateral L</td></tr>
     <tr><td>LP</td><td align=center>LogTalk</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Lateral L</td></tr>
     <tr><td>PL</td><td align=center>Prolog</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Plain Prolog</td></tr>
     <tr><td>PL</td><td align=center>Prolog</td><td align=center>No</td><td>Plain Prolog</td></tr>
     <tr style="background-color:white;font-size:10px;"><td colspan=4 align=center>Back </td></tr>
    <tr><td>ST</td><td align=center>Smalltalk&sup2;</td><td align=center>No</td><td>SPO Context</td></tr>
     <tr><td>MINT</td><td align=center>MINT 3</td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>MCP direct interpreter</td></tr>
     <tr style="background-color:white;font-size:10px;"><td colspan=4 align=center>Machine Facing </td></tr>
     <tr><td>SUBROUTINE</td><td align=center><a href=https://www.gnu.org/software/marst/><b>A60</b></a></td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>JCL </td></tr>
     <tr><td>JOB</td><td align=center>MINT 3</td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>JCL</td></tr>
     <tr><td>UNIT</td><td align=center><a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://jmvdveer.home.xs4all.nl/en.algol-68-genie.html><b>A68</b></a></td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>System Applications</td></tr>
     <tr><td>SUBROUTINE</td><td align=center><a href=https://www.gnu.org/software/marst/><b>A60</b></a></td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>JCL Procedures</td></tr>
     </table><br><br>
     <tr><td>UNIT</td><td align=center><a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://jmvdveer.home.xs4all.nl/en.algol-68-genie.html><b>A68</b></a></td><td align=center>Yes</td><td>MCP Libraries</td></tr>
     </table><br>&sup1;<font size=1>An APP is a JOB with device/station dependencies</font> &nbsp;&sup2;<font size=1>headless squeak</font><br>
     </center>
     </center>
   Intrinsic means the lang is native to MCP/WFL and doesn't require COMPILE or BIND to produce a RUN eligible object title.<br>
   Intrinsic means the lang is native to MCP/WFL and doesn't require COMPILE or BIND to produce a RUN eligible object title. Enterpise facing means oriented to programming users of the system, Machine facing means me, for my motivation, satisfaction and design intent of real machine independence of the core super-OS.
   MAKE binds job titles to files executable by the <b>cande</b> MCS with the START or SCHEDULE commands.
   Users can create their own semantic spaces by using WFL and the standard modern high level lang blocks while the MINT and Algol elements are my private programming of DCP/MCP not meant
  for user consuption but visible to satisfy transparency requirements.
   <div style="width:60%;text-align:justify;">
   <div style="width:60%;text-align:justify;">
   WFL(JCL) job streams are translated from source text to A60/C, A68, and MINT then compiled and linked to the Barton machine, or interpreted by genie or MINT, respectively. WFL(JCL) is A60 translated to C, compiled and bound, interspersed with the JCL statements interpreted by the B machine. Non-intrinsic code forms unified code trees in the DGUI and is maintained there under the control of the governing build  statements and commands. Thus, a general WFL job orchestrates an application divided into system part executed by the B machine and application parts executed in the OS image extended from the base OS by the B machine.<br><br>'WFL' used without the JCL qualifier or 'WFL workframe' refers to general source processing framework of the high level part of the DCP. Build statements and commands refers to COMPILE/BIND/MAKE.
   Procedural WFL is translated from source text to A60/C, then compiled and linked to the Barton machine, or directly interpreted by genie or MINT. Non-WFL blocks are compiled and bound  
and used in the concrete context of the DS which they form as extensions of the WFL/B machine.<br><br>
The JCL is defined by an M-TRAN phrase grammar which can contain pure MINT blocks but general procedures are meant to be in Algol dialects.<br><br>
A Smalltalk code set is part of the system concept and a "WFL workframe" is intended as an IDE and GUI for DCP/MCP (DGUI/SPO) but it is not required for ops and will not be
available until I've worked it on the basis of the experience of the first working clusters.
   </div>
   </div>
</blockquote><br><br>
</blockquote><br><br>
   <span style="position:relative;top:-30px;font-size:12px;">The namestyles are a homage to <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_MCP>MCP</a> and <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversational_Monitor_System>VM/CMS</a> mainframe OSes, both still in use and Unisys WFL (<a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://public.support.unisys.com/aseries/docs/clearpath-mcp-18.0/86001047-516/index.html>Work Flow Language</a>). The machine thus defined will be ported to other cloud vendors (Google, Azure, et. al.) after workout in Akamai (linode) and AWS.</span>
   <span style="position:relative;top:-30px;font-size:12px;">The namestyles are a homage to <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Burroughs_MCP>MCP</a> and <a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conversational_Monitor_System>VM/CMS</a> mainframe OSes, both still in use and Unisys WFL (<a style="background-color:aliceblue;"  href=https://public.support.unisys.com/aseries/docs/clearpath-mcp-18.0/86001047-516/index.html>Work Flow Language</a>). MCP as an actually delivered OS is composed of cells (containers) and OS images (nodes) running system Apps and Jobs coded in WFL and the supported langs. </span>
<div  style="float:right;text-align:center;font-size:12px;position:relative;left:-150px;top:-230px;width:400px;font-family:Papyrus;" ><a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abydos_King_List><img align=right width=400px src=https://meansofproduction.biz/images/kings_list.012.jpg></a><br>The Abydos Kings List &nbsp; c. -400 &nbsp; to &nbsp; 1400 &nbsp; 公元, &nbsp; Menes &mdash; Seti I</div>
<div  style="float:right;text-align:center;font-size:12px;position:relative;left:-135px;top:-220px;width:400px;font-family:Papyrus;" ><a href=https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abydos_King_List><img align=right width=400px src=https://meansofproduction.biz/images/kings_list.012.jpg></a><br>The Abydos Kings List &nbsp; c. -400 &nbsp; to &nbsp; 1400 &nbsp; 公元, &nbsp; Menes &mdash; Seti I</div>
</blockquote>
</blockquote>
  </div>
  </div>

Latest revision as of 19:52, 21 November 2024

mcpcms  

  conversational monitoring system  
DCP Shell  
    minimalist clustering paradigm  

  launch   — an MCP cell ¹ provisioned by the Domain Control Program per your current context. ²
Dual 6700, c. 1971/2, binding says MK 0.0, so 2.0.0

This page has an audio track, mouseover for title/credit.

Semantic Roadmap

  • 0.4.0  074-11-02  1st ed. tl;dr story freeze.†
  • 0.9.0  07y-mm-dd  LAN and cloud provisioning for network nodes.
  • 1.0.0  07y-mm-dd  BaselineOfDCP (provisions FRED instances).
  • 1.1.0  07y-mm-dd  Transparent Ledger (Books), DCP live in wild.
  • 1.2.0  07y-mm-dd  BaselineOfWFL.
  • 1.3.0  07y-mm-dd  ∫ x 𝔻 ∂ DS, stable boot KEE SPA.
  • 2.0.0  07y-mm-dd  2nd ed. tl;dr story (feat: visual programming/execution), 1st WFL w integral DGUI IDE.
  • 2.1.0  07y-mm-dd  ∫ VM (CMS, MVS) / DCP ∂ DS, the MF-One story.
  • 3.0.0  08y-mm-dd  Mature DDD/KEE product.
MCP-CMS — a platform for the Domain Control Program, with an aesthetic in homage to the Burroughs and IBM OSes.

¹ Resource limits are dynamically set except for F class which always gets the system limit if there is one which for billable accounts is the set spend limit.
² Set parameters for your cloud provider in the DS Dashboard control blocks in your DCMS account or use system inventory.

† This page and About DCP are top level specifying stories, cog arch internals aren't divulged as I mean them to be adaptable without notice, everything else is source accessible by DevOps users.

MCPCMS presents the "CANDE" MCS³ for DS users.

AKPERSONs (see Entitlements), and whitelisted stations can connect with the link above or in a running SPO to a MCP running it.

The attempt, if it reaches the DCP, results in completion codes reported in DS control block displays in your DCMS profile.
Only ssh access from the wild, but this page will attempt, using your SAR credentials if the session role is greater than 1.
MCP operator messages will go to your ODT message queue.


³ MCS: a message control subsystem of a MCP.

ODT MCS

MCP-CMS connects via a MCS which is often referred to as the CANDE MCS although it is more general than that being the default ubiquitous DCP/MCP MCS. Upon mcpcms connect, like the lang specific subshells in the next §, an additional command cande can be used which will process the MCP-CMS system commands analogous to those in the MCP 15 document above. The system command processor is also available as a pane in the SPO.

In Burroughs MCP, the CANDE MCS was used ubiquitously. I recall using a full screen editor which i think fed CANDE. Commands are implemented per need and some such as the text edit functions likely never will be in mcpcms cande. CANDE is used in current Unisys MCP but neither it nor the MCS have their former prominence when the OS runs under Windows.

mcpcms

A modified zsh for MCP has the role CMS has in VM/CMS. Upon successful connect, the launch link above results in a terminal session with this shell in the browser. Aside from the modification for the MCP machine model, it is otherwise just zsh however the following (mode) commands are available to establish different shell behaviour in support of the KEE:

  • shcl
  • shhs
  • upsh

which have the lisp, haskell, and prolog natures, respectively. shcl is the only one which is a full shell, the others are ways to do posix shell things in lang. While in general Lisp and prolog implementations can vary, shcl and upsh require sbcl and swipl, respectively. During early dev, before DCP WFL is available DCP is implemented in these shells plus MCP. mcpcms can be accessed with ssh using the following script. Using the FQDSAgentName syntax is equivalent to what the launch link does in an AKPERSONs session.

#!/usr/bin/bash
# save as <fileName> and invoke with <fileName>  <connect-spec> where            
#         
#  <connect-spec> ::= <mcpCommand> <FQDSAgentName> | <connect-spec>
#  <connect-spec> ::= <ipV6Address>:<port> | <ipV4Address>:<port>
#  FQDSAgentName  ::= <agentId>@<domain>[:<port>]
#
#  and the values manually supplied from control blocks in the DCMS account profile where connect attempt results will also be available.  
#  The <mcpCommand>.  indicates the station where the script runs is trusted and the responsible AKPERSON is the operator.
#
if [ -z $2 ] then
  ssh  $1
  exit
fi
#
# Try a connect based on just the FQDSA assuming an eligible station. A port on submitted second parm is ignored with a warning.
# The no <mcpCommand> specified, a DCP determined default shell type is connected.
#
FQDSA=mcp.meansofproduction.biz/?FQDSA=$2&$1
PARMS=$(curl -L $FQDSA)
ssh $PARMS

mcpcms is implemented first for MCP nodes and cells which are whole or containerized linux instances. Cloud compute resources are dynamically provisioned using either system inventory or user supplied provisioning credentials with the MCP supported cloud vendors. Later MCP for Mac and Windows will allow cells there and a version supporting Hercules will use VM/CMS instead of mcpcms.

DCP WFL

is eponymous from the MCP WFL with some preserved aesthetics but as a vehicle for DCP and arch for MCP —

  • The Job is not the top level construct. The Job or App is the closest construct to heritage WFL in my WFL but with ops on my MCP rather than the Burroughs/Unisys one and expansion beyond batch ops.
  • In my WFL, Namespace, Database, and then App/Job is the scope hierarchy. Namespace and Database are elements of a domain space and may span multiple MCP instances but Jobs are limited to a single MCP.

In Burroughs systems, WFL didn have as high a profile as IBM JCL, the main punch of the overall system, in an industry installation, would be its system of transactions and these ran from a database which the Burroughs architecture delivered seamlessly without WFL to terminals as a special db stack. Our WFL is the central driver and basis of our MCP/DCP architecture

  1. implements the DCP machine model as a complement to
  2. the MCP which provides the real machine model and
  3. with code blocks containing text of other supported langs

DCP WFL is developed in a bottom up manner from this statement of design intent without any spec other than the heritage systems and the DCP/MCP concept. In the initial releases there will be no documentation outside of story text, and the top level pamphlets. Code cannot move into WFL blocks from its free form before the 1.2.0 milestone. In standard Algol convention № 3 above is implemented by these block variants with the same delimitation by BEGIN and END bounded blocks:

MCP Block Types
DeclaratorLanguageIntrinsicPurpose/Role
Enterprise Facing
APP¹,DB,NSWFL YesJob, Database, & Namespace control
CLCommon LispNoLateral R
HSHaskell NoApplications
LPLogTalkNoLateral L
PLPrologNoPlain Prolog
STSmalltalk²NoSPO Context
Machine Facing
JOBMINT 3YesJCL
SUBROUTINEA60YesJCL Procedures
UNITA68YesMCP Libraries

¹An APP is a JOB with device/station dependencies  ²headless squeak

Intrinsic means the lang is native to MCP/WFL and doesn't require COMPILE or BIND to produce a RUN eligible object title. Enterpise facing means oriented to programming users of the system, Machine facing means me, for my motivation, satisfaction and design intent of real machine independence of the core super-OS. Users can create their own semantic spaces by using WFL and the standard modern high level lang blocks while the MINT and Algol elements are my private programming of DCP/MCP not meant for user consuption but visible to satisfy transparency requirements.

Procedural WFL is translated from source text to A60/C, then compiled and linked to the Barton machine, or directly interpreted by genie or MINT. Non-WFL blocks are compiled and bound and used in the concrete context of the DS which they form as extensions of the WFL/B machine.

The JCL is defined by an M-TRAN phrase grammar which can contain pure MINT blocks but general procedures are meant to be in Algol dialects.

A Smalltalk code set is part of the system concept and a "WFL workframe" is intended as an IDE and GUI for DCP/MCP (DGUI/SPO) but it is not required for ops and will not be available until I've worked it on the basis of the experience of the first working clusters.



The namestyles are a homage to MCP and VM/CMS mainframe OSes, both still in use and Unisys WFL (Work Flow Language). MCP as an actually delivered OS is composed of cells (containers) and OS images (nodes) running system Apps and Jobs coded in WFL and the supported langs.


The Abydos Kings List   c. -400   to   1400   公元,   Menes — Seti I